How Much Does Self- Talk Influence Fatigue? A Comparison of Performance, Perceived Exertion, and Neuromuscular Patterns during High-Intensity Power Cleans

Self-talk and fatigue

  • Alexander D. Young Department of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Southeastern Louisiana University
  • Daniel B. Hollander Southeastern Louisiana University
  • Brandonte A. Baiamonte Department of Psychology, Southeastern Louisiana University
  • Ashley Bowers School of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University
  • Edward P. Hebert Department of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Southeastern Louisiana University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8551-1763
  • Robert R. Kraemer Department of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Southeastern Louisiana University, Department of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7105-6595
Keywords: Rate of perceived exertion, Electromyogram, Cognitive strategies

Abstract

Experienced athletes use self-talk (ST) when challenged to monitor distress, to continue effort, and battle fatigue. The power clean, a training modality for power sports, challenges athletes to develop cognitive strategies to maintain performance, technique, and persist. A problem has been that ST studies have not measured perception of effort and muscle firing when ST is purposefully withheld. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of ST to a control group during a session of power clean to fatigue. Also, multiple parameters were assessed and included perceptual, neural, and performance standards. The method of randomly assigned ST and control (CON) groups compared 24 experienced Olympic lifting men (age range 18 to 28 years). The groups completed continuous sets of power cleans for three repetitions at 85% of maximum effort with a three-minute rest in between sets until failure. The ST group was instructed to engage in organic, goal-directed self-talk (ST group) during exercise. The CON group focused on a neutral attentional focus. The results demonstrated that the ST group achieved more sets, reps, and total weight lifted (p < 0.05). Both groups had comparable increases in perceived exertion prior to fatigue (p < 0.001). Persistence (numbers of sets and repetitions) after reaching the perceptual breakpoint (RPE of “8”) was higher for the ST group (p <0.01) by 8.5 repetitions. Pain tolerance was slightly higher in the ST group as well. The ST group demonstrated lower activation in two muscle groups despite performing more work. In conclusion, ST enhanced performance by 43% once an RPE of eight was reached, resulted in 63% more repetitions, and demonstrated more efficient muscle activation patterns. 

Author Biographies

Brandonte A. Baiamonte, Department of Psychology, Southeastern Louisiana University

Dr. Baiamonte is an associate professor in the Department of Psychology at Southeastern Louisiana University.

Ashley Bowers, School of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University

Dr. Bowers is an Associate Professor of Professional Practice at LSU.

Edward P. Hebert, Department of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Southeastern Louisiana University

Dr. Hebert is a Professor of Kinesiology at Southeastern Louisiana University.

Robert R. Kraemer, Department of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Southeastern Louisiana University, Department of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University

Dr. Kraemer is a Professor Emeritus in the Department of Kinesiology and Health Studies at Southeastern Louisiana University. 

Published
2023-11-24
How to Cite
Young, A. D., Hollander, D. B., Baiamonte, B. A., Bowers, A., Hebert, E. P., & Kraemer, R. R. (2023). How Much Does Self- Talk Influence Fatigue? A Comparison of Performance, Perceived Exertion, and Neuromuscular Patterns during High-Intensity Power Cleans. International Journal of Strength and Conditioning, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v3i1.255