Response to the Comment on our Article: "Explosive is not a Term Defined in the International System of Units and Should not be Used to Describe Neuromuscular Performance"

Authors

  • Bernardo Ide Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4057-0051
  • Amanda P. Silvatti Federal University of Viçosa
  • Craig A. Staunton Mid Sweden University
  • Moacir Marocolo Federal University of Juiz de Fora
  • Dustin J. Oranchuk University of Colorado
  • Gustavo R. Mota Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6109-0658

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v5i1.506

Abstract

We thank Schumann et al. (Schumann, Feuerbacher et al. 2024) for their engagement and thoughtful comments on our article (Ide, Silvatti et al. 2023), and the overarching use of terminology in sports science. Academic debate is critical for advancing our field, and we welcome the opportunity to clarify and expand on our arguments. While their comment offers a perspective on practical terminology use, we maintain that the application of “explosive” in scientific literature may be both unnecessary and potentially misleading.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Published

2025-02-14

How to Cite

Ide, Bernardo, Amanda P. Silvatti, Craig A. Staunton, Moacir Marocolo, Dustin J. Oranchuk, and Gustavo R. Mota. 2025. “Response to the Comment on Our Article: ‘Explosive Is Not a Term Defined in the International System of Units and Should Not Be Used to Describe Neuromuscular Performance’”. International Journal of Strength and Conditioning 5 (1). https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v5i1.506.