A Preliminary Investigation of the Relationship of Three Key Bar Positions on Weightlifting Performance

Authors

  • Wesley Gawel Center of Excellence for Sport Science and Coach Education, School of Exercise and Sport Science, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA
  • Marten Bauer Center of Excellence for Sport Science and Coach Education, School of Exercise and Sport Science, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA
  • Chieh-Hsin You Center of Excellence for Sport Science and Coach Education, School of Exercise and Sport Science, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA
  • Kyle Rochua Science and Math Division, Brevard College, Brevard, USA
  • Daniel Gahreman Center of Excellence for Sport Science and Coach Education, School of Exercise and Sport Science, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA
  • Guy Hornsby School of Sport Sciences, College of Applied Human Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA
  • Satoshi Mizuguchi Center of Excellence for Sport Science and Coach Education, School of Exercise and Sport Science, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA
  • Michael Stone Center of Excellence for Sport Science and Coach Education, School of Exercise and Sport Science, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA; & Institute for Sport, Physical Education and Health Sciences (ISPEHS} The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh Scotland, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v6i1.508

Keywords:

Strength, Technique, Rate of force development

Abstract

Background: There are three fundamental bar positions in weightlifting: 1) Set-up (S), 2) Knee (K), and 3) Power Position (P). Commonly, these positions are evaluated using a clean-grip isometric pull. Purpose: To compare and describe relationships between the three bar positions in an isometric pull and with meet performance in regional to international level weightlifters. Methods: Male (n=6) and female (n=6) weightlifters (age 19-23 yrs.) volunteered. Males were better weightlifters than the females. Pulls were performed from top-down (P - K - S). Isometric peak force (IPF) and rate of force development 0-250ms (RFD250) were derived from force-time curve analysis. A 2x3 mixed ANOVA was used to assess the effects of sex and position. Pearson correlations established relationships. Results: Males produced greater values (both absolute and relative) than females at all positions (p ≤ 0.05). IPF, IPFa and RFD250 at P were greater (p ≤ 0.05) than the other two positions. IPF and IPFa from S and K were similar. Correlations with performance were moderate to strong for absolute and scaled conditions; correlations were generally weaker for females. Correlations for IPF were stronger at S than P. RFD250 correlations were generally stronger at P. Conclusion: Metrics from S and P correlate better with performance than K, with IPF and IPFa favoring S while RFD250 favors P. Both positions seem to be viable options for monitoring weightlifters. Results indicate males and females may produce different relationships, perhaps indicating weakness at specific positions.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-06

How to Cite

Gawel, Wesley, Marten Bauer, Chieh-Hsin You, Kyle Rochua, Daniel Gahreman, Guy Hornsby, Satoshi Mizuguchi, and Michael Stone. 2026. “A Preliminary Investigation of the Relationship of Three Key Bar Positions on Weightlifting Performance”. International Journal of Strength and Conditioning 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v6i1.508.

Most read articles by the same author(s)