The Myth of the Myth? An Opinion

Authors

  • Michael Stone East Tennessee State University
  • Guy Hornsby West Virginia University
  • Alex Long East Tennessee State University
  • Andrew Nelson East Tennessee State University
  • Nick Goode East Tennessee State University
  • Kurt McDowell East Tennessee State University
  • Satoshi Mizuguchi East Tennessee State University
  • Daniel Gahreman East Tennessee State University
  • Marco Duca East Tennessee State University
  • Kevin Carroll East Tennessee State University
  • Michael Ramsey East Tennessee State University
  • Margaret Stone East Tennessee State University
  • Kyle Pierce Louisiana State University at Shreveport
  • Wes Gawel East Tennessee State University
  • Joe D'amato Chicago White Sox
  • Andrew Fry University of Kansas
  • Amit Batra Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego we Wrocławiu
  • Greg Haff Edith Cowan University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v4i1.353

Keywords:

Periodization, Myth, Training

Abstract

It has become quite popular to question accepted scientific evidence, particularly as it pertains to the validity of various aspects of sport science.  Recently, the concept of periodization has been questioned as to its usefulness and even its existence being described as “Myth.” It is the intent of the authors in this informed perspective to combat this idea through both a philosophical discussion on scientific theory as well as pointing out problems with their claim.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-22

How to Cite

Stone, Michael, Guy Hornsby, Alex Long, Andrew Nelson, Nick Goode, Kurt McDowell, Satoshi Mizuguchi, et al. 2024. “The Myth of the Myth? An Opinion ”. International Journal of Strength and Conditioning 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v4i1.353.