The Myth of the Myth? An Opinion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v4i1.353Keywords:
Periodization, Myth, TrainingAbstract
It has become quite popular to question accepted scientific evidence, particularly as it pertains to the validity of various aspects of sport science. Recently, the concept of periodization has been questioned as to its usefulness and even its existence being described as “Myth.” It is the intent of the authors in this informed perspective to combat this idea through both a philosophical discussion on scientific theory as well as pointing out problems with their claim.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Michael Stone, Guy Hornsby, Alex Long, Andrew Nelson, Nick Goode, Kurt McDowell, Satoshi Mizuguchi, Daniel Gahreman, Marco Duca, Kevin Carroll, Michael Ramsey, Margaret Stone, Kyle Pierce, Wes Gawel, Joe D'amato, Andrew Fry, Amit Batra, Greg Haff
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work, granting IJSC a license to publish and distribute. All articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. We clearly state any fees associated with submissions or access for readers. For copyright or licensing queries, stakeholders can reach out to journal@iusca.org.
