Effects of Optimum Power Load vs Mixed Model Training Methods on Lower Limb Strength and Dynamic Performance in Female Athletes

Abstract

Training with optimum power load (OPL) was shown to result in improved lower limb strength. However, recent study has recommended using the mixed model training (MMT) method which involves frequent varying of training loads. As the training adaptations to OPL and MMT training methods have not been directly compared, hence, the purpose of this study was to compare the effects of OPL and MMT on lower limb neuromuscular adaptations. Seventeen female athletes (age: 22±2.9 years, height: 162.7±5.2 cm, bodyweight: 60.5±9.6 kg) were randomly assigned to either MMT or OPL training (OPLT) group. Both groups performed similar training program twice a week for six weeks. However, MMT performed the loaded CMJ exercise at -15-20% and +20-25% of OPL, while OPLT performed it at OPL. Pre- and post-test included CMJ, 5-0-5 change of direction test (505 COD), 20-m sprint and isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP). Both groups showed significant improvement in CMJ height (MMT: P=0.025, g=0.48, OPLT: P=0.003, g=0.72), 505 COD (MMT: P<0.001, g=1.12, OPLT: P=0.006, g=0.36), 20-m sprint (MMT: P<0.001, g=0.65, OPLT: P=0.002, g=0.28), IMTP peak force (MMT: P<0.001, g=0.66, OPLT: P<0.001, g=0.46) and IMTP force at 100 ms (MMT: P=0.019, g=0.66, OPLT: P=0.001, g=0.60). Only MMT significantly improved CMJ mean propulsion force (P=0.004, g=0.34), a variable that contributes to greater jump height. While OPLT resulted in greater effect for CMJ height, MMT resulted in greater effect for 505 COD, 20-m sprint and IMTP performance. These findings suggest that frequent varying of resistance may induce greater neuromuscular adaptations.