Stakeholders Perceptions of Undergraduate and Postgraduate Strength and Conditioning Education in the United Kingdom: A Survey Study

Authors

  • Anthony Weldon Centre for Life and Sport Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK; & Aston Villa Foundation, Aston Villa Football Club, Birmingham, UK https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5762-332X
  • Kevin Till Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9686-0536
  • Jonathan Hughes Youth Physical Development Center, Cardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK
  • Ibrahim Akubat Exercise and Health Research Centre, Birmingham Newman University, Birmingham, UK
  • James Keenan School of Human Sciences, University of Derby, Derby, UK https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7295-8061
  • Andrea Cameron Faculty of Social and Applied Sciences, Abertay University, Dundee, UK https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3606-3885
  • Anthony Turner Faculty of Science and Technology, London Sport Institute, Middlesex University, London, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v6i1.567

Keywords:

Stakeholders, education, higher education, strength and conditioning

Abstract

The number of strength and conditioning (S&C) degrees in the United Kingdom has grown alongside the discipline’s popularity. The design and development of these degrees are influenced by various stakeholders, including S&C association representatives, potential employers, degree representatives, students, and graduates. Prior to this study, the collective perceptions of these stakeholders regarding UK S&C degrees had not been researched. This study filled this gap by reporting on the results of 73 participants who completed a one-time anonymous survey, consisting of six sections: (a) background information, (b) degree endorsement, recognition, and accreditation, (c) course structure, (d) placements, (e) module topics, and (f) further information. Frequency analysis was employed for fixed-response questions and thematic analysis for open-ended questions. Participants valued S&C associations and their role in providing degree endorsements, recognitions, and accreditations as they demonstrate quality assurance and alignment with industry standards. However, they felt that professional qualifications from these associations should be more integrated into degree programmes. Regarding degree content and structure, participants agreed that undergraduate degrees should focus on foundational knowledge (e.g., physiology), while postgraduate degrees should cover specialised S&C content and applied practice (e.g., placements). However, some differences in opinion were observed concerning module topics, with participants lacking interest in research-based modules, despite being common, especially at postgraduate level. Placements were considered very important for gaining authentic practical experience, with most participants recommending they be compulsory. Although, flexibility was recommended for students with existing industry experience. These findings provide valuable and needed insights into current perceptions of UK S&C degrees, which may inform stakeholders decisions and practices, lead to closer alignment between stakeholder groups, and create beneficial changes for UK S&C degrees.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-08

How to Cite

Weldon, Anthony, Kevin Till, Jonathan Hughes, Ibrahim Akubat, James Keenan, Andrea Cameron, and Anthony Turner. 2026. “Stakeholders Perceptions of Undergraduate and Postgraduate Strength and Conditioning Education in the United Kingdom: A Survey Study”. International Journal of Strength and Conditioning 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v6i1.567.

Most read articles by the same author(s)